sport.ggAI esports predictions

AI predictions for the next
wave of matches.

A machine-generated read on every upcoming CS2, League of Legends, Dota 2, and Valorant match — win probabilities, form context, and a one-line take from our model. Star a match to get an email when the pick changes.

  1. 01

    Pull the fixtures

    Every upcoming professional match across CS2, LoL, Dota 2, and Valorant.

  2. 02

    Read the form

    Last ten series for each team — record, opponents, event context.

  3. 03

    Ask the model

    A calibrated win probability, a one-line headline, and short reasoning.

    1. Dota 2 · Esports World Cup · Best of 3
      Jul 16, 11:00 UTC
      Team Yandex
      vs
      Team Spirit
      TY 65%35% TS
      "Undefeated Yandex momentum will topple the reigning kings in a thriller"Read more

      Team Yandex enters the playoffs with an impeccable 9-0 run, showcasing elite coordination and a superior understanding of the current patch. While Team Spirit remains a legendary playoff threat, Yandex's flawless momentum and recent dominance over top-tier squads give them the narrow edge in this matchup.

    2. Dota 2 · Esports World Cup · Best of 3
      Jul 16, 14:30 UTC
      PARIVISION
      vs
      Rune Eaters
      PARI 78%22% RE
      "PARIVISION'S elite tier consistency will overwhelm the inconsistent Rune Eaters lineup."Read more

      PARIVISION enters the playoffs with superior momentum, boasting a 77% win rate against a significantly higher caliber of opponents like Team Falcons. Rune Eaters have struggled for consistency and lack the tactical depth to counter PARIVISION'S current mid-game objective control.

    3. Dota 2 · Esports World Cup · Best of 3
      Jul 17, 11:00 UTC
      Nigma Galaxy
      vs
      BetBoom Team
      NGX 28%72% BB
      "Elite competition edge favors BetBoom over Nigma's lower-tier win streak."Read more

      While Nigma Galaxy holds an impressive match record, their wins predominantly come against Tier-2 opponents. BetBoom Team has maintained a strong form against elite Tier-1 competition, giving them a significant mechanical and tactical advantage in this playoff series.

    4. Dota 2 · Esports World Cup · Best of 3
      Jul 17, 14:30 UTC
      Team Falcons
      vs
      Vici Gaming
      FLC 68%32% VG
      "Falcons' elite competition experience outshines Vici's regional momentum"Read more

      While Vici Gaming holds a slightly better record, Team Falcons have been battle-tested against a higher tier of international opponents. The tactical versatility of the Falcons core should neutralize Vici's aggressive laning phase in a playoff setting.

    5. Dota 2 · Games of the Future · Best of 3
      Jul 31, 05:00 UTC
      Rune Eaters
      vs
      Midas Club
      RE 68%32% Midas
      "Rune Eaters exploit Midas Club's late-game instability to secure Group B dominance."Read more

      Rune Eaters have demonstrated higher competitive resilience against Tier-1 opponents like Team Falcons compared to Midas Club's struggling regional form. The drafting gap favors Rune Eaters, who consistently punish the defensive lapses seen in Midas Club's recent losses to Estar Backs.

    6. Dota 2 · Games of the Future · Best of 3
      Jul 31, 05:00 UTC
      Virtus.pro
      vs
      Execration
      VP 72%28% XctN
      "Virtus.pro experience edge ensures a comfortable victory over inconsistent Execration roster"Read more

      Despite mixed results, Virtus.pro has faced significantly higher tiers of competition including OG and 1win. Execration struggles for consistency against regional tier-2 teams and lacks the strategic depth to handle VP's structured late-game execution.

    7. Dota 2 · Games of the Future · Best of 3
      Jul 31, 08:00 UTC
      Team Resilience
      vs
      PlayTime
      TR 72%28% PlayTime
      "Resilience outshines PlayTime through superior consistency and elite-tier competition experience."Read more

      Team Resilience holds a significant momentum advantage with a 70% win rate against top-tier organizations like Xtreme and Vici. PlayTime has struggled against lower-ranked squads and lacks the strategic depth to counter Resilience's current form in high-pressure Group Stage scenarios.

    8. Dota 2 · Games of the Future · Best of 3
      Jul 31, 08:00 UTC
      Vici Gaming
      vs
      Amaru Gaming
      VG 82%18% Amaru Gaming
      "Vici Gaming Outclasses Amaru Through Superior Tier-One Competitive Form"Read more

      Vici Gaming has maintained a strong 70% win rate against elite opposition like Team Spirit and PARIVISION. In contrast, Amaru Gaming has struggled for consistency while facing lower-tier regional teams. The structural discipline and veteran experience of Vici should facilitate a clean sweep.

    9. Dota 2 · Games of the Future · Best of 3
      Jul 31, 11:00 UTC
      L1ga Team
      vs
      REKONIX
      L1GA 68%32% RNX
      "L1ga Team's superior regional depth will stifle REKONIX's inconsistent core play"Read more

      L1ga Team has demonstrated a more stable early-game meta-read despite their mixed record, often taking maps off top-tier European organizations. REKONIX has struggled against disciplined squads recently and lacks the strategic depth required to win a protracted Best of 3 series.

    10. Dota 2 · Games of the Future · Best of 3
      Jul 31, 11:00 UTC
      Enjoy
      vs
      GLYPH
      Enjoy 32%68% GLYPH
      "GLYPH's superior experience against tier-one competition secures the victory."Read more

      While both teams have struggling records, GLYPH has faced significantly higher-caliber opponents like OG and Execration, battle-hardening their roster. Enjoy's recent losses against teams like HULIGANI suggest a lack of coordination that GLYPH's veterancy should easily exploit in a Best of 3 format.

    11. Dota 2 · Games of the Future · Best of 3
      Jul 31, 14:00 UTC
      Xtreme Gaming
      vs
      LGD Gaming
      Xtreme 68%32% LGD
      "Ame's star power outweighs LGD's recent form against lower-tier competition"Read more

      While LGD Gaming holds a better recent win rate, their record is inflated by victories over tier-two opponents like 1win and MOUZ. Xtreme Gaming has struggled but maintained a much higher strength of schedule, consistently competing against elite teams like Team Falcons and Liquid.

    12. Dota 2 · Games of the Future · Best of 3
      Jul 31, 14:00 UTC
      Yakult Brothers
      vs
      Zero Tenacity
      YB 68%32% Z10
      "Tier-one experience gives Yakult Brothers the edge over Zero Tenacity"Read more

      Yakult Brothers have faced significantly stronger competition lately, including multiple series against proven rosters like Vici Gaming. While both teams share similar records, Zero Tenacity's victories came against lower-tier regional stacks, making them the underdogs in this tactical matchup.

    Frequently asked

    How does sport.gg predict esports matches?

    Show

    For each upcoming match we pull the two teams' recent series results, opponent quality, and event context, then ask a large language model to weigh the matchup and return a calibrated win probability plus a short written take.

    Which games does sport.gg cover?

    Show

    Counter-Strike 2, League of Legends, Dota 2, and Valorant. Coverage focuses on tier-one and major tier-two events across every region.

    How accurate are the predictions?

    Show

    The model targets calibration rather than binary picks — a 65% call should win about two out of three times over a large sample. Best-of-fives are more predictable than best-of-ones because variance smooths out over more games.

    How often are predictions updated?

    Show

    Match schedules refresh continuously. Each prediction is generated once per match and cached for 24 hours, then regenerated so recent form and roster changes are reflected.

    Is this betting advice?

    Show

    No. Predictions on sport.gg are AI-generated for entertainment and analysis. We do not provide betting advice and do not accept wagers.

    Why should I trust an AI over a human analyst?

    Show

    You shouldn't, in the strong sense. The model is consistent and cheap to run across every match on the schedule, but individual human analysts with map-level knowledge often beat it on high-stakes series. Treat it as a fast baseline read, not a verdict.